‘Amazing’! NY Times’ presents mock-tastic argument for dismissal of Sarah Palin’s lawsuit

As we’ve reported previously, Sarah Palin filed a defamation lawsuit against the New York Times following a now “corrected” editorial in which the editorial board tied Palin to the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords. The paper published similar claims previously, but the Times’ is reportedly taking this laughable approach:

The New York Times is claiming the Palin case should be dismissed because it is unreasonable to assume the Editors read the New York Times. https://t.co/QyuRd9HFmd

— Lee Doren (@LDoren) August 10, 2017

Wait, come again…

Lets see if I've got this straight It is unreasonable to think that the editors of the New York Times read the New York Times? https://t.co/MtHrQqCiny

— David Burton (@HalfTangible) August 10, 2017

if ( (window.__aa_fraud_serve === undefined) || (window.__aa_fraud_serve == true) ) { googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(“div-gpt-300x250_1”); }); }

Read more: http://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2017/08/10/amazing-ny-times-presents-mock-tastic-argument-for-dismissal-of-sarah-palins-lawsuit/